Introduction
A tasty gluten-free pie crust is a game-changer for those with gluten sensitivities. Nothing beats the comforting aroma of a freshly baked pie. The ultimate guide to gluten-free pie crusts will reveal how to make flaky and flavorful crusts without gluten. This article provides valuable insights and a foolproof recipe for gluten-free pie crust success, regardless of whether you're a newbie or an experienced baker.
Importance of Gluten-Free Options
Gluten-free diets have gained popularity for various reasons, including celiac disease, personal dietary choices, or gluten intolerance. Gluten-free options allow individuals to enjoy their favorite treats without compromising their health or taste preferences.
Challenges of Gluten-Free Pie Crust
Creating a gluten-free pie crust comes with unique challenges. Gluten provides elasticity and structure to traditional pie crusts, so achieving a tender and flaky texture can be more difficult. However, with the right techniques and ingredients, you can overcome these challenges and create a delectable gluten-free pie crust.
Key Ingredients for a Perfect Gluten-Free Pie Crust
To create the ultimate gluten-free pie crust, it's essential to understand the main ingredients that blend perfectly with its texture and flavor:

1. Gluten-Free Flour Blends: Using a single gluten-free flour can be challenging for replicating the texture of traditional pie crusts. However, combining different flours such as rice flour, tapioca flour, and almond flour helps balance flavor and texture.
2. Fats for Flakiness: Incorporating the right fats into your gluten-free pie crust is essential for achieving flakiness. Opt for ingredients like chilled butter or dairy-free alternatives like coconut oil or vegan margarine.
3. Binding Agents: As gluten-free flours lack the binding properties of gluten, it's important to add binding agents to the pie crust. Xanthan gum or ground flaxseed mixed with water can provide the necessary structure.
4. Flavor Enhancers: Enhance the flavor of your gluten-free pie crust by adding a touch of sweetness with ingredients like sugar or maple syrup. Incorporate herbs, spices, or grated cheese for a savory crust to complement the filling.

Mastering the Technique: gluten-free pie crust game:
Perfecting the technique is crucial for achieving a successful gluten-free pie crust. Pay attention to the following steps:

1. Chilling the Ingredients: Ensure all the ingredients, including the flour blend and fats, are well chilled before starting. Cold ingredients help maintain the desired texture and prevent the fats from melting too quickly.
2. Proper Mixing: Mix the ingredients using a light hand. Over-mixing can lead to a tough crust. Instead, gently combine the flour blend, fats, binding agents, and flavor enhancers until the dough comes together.
3. Rolling Out the Dough: Roll out the gluten-free pie crust carefully to achieve the desired thickness. Sprinkle some gluten-free flour blend on the rolling surface to prevent sticking. Work slowly and patch any cracks that may occur.
4. Pre-Baking Techniques: Pre-bake the gluten-free pie crust before adding the filling to ensure a crisp crust. Blind baking helps the crust hold its shape and prevents it from becoming soggy.

Tricks and Tips for a Good Gluten-Free Pie Crust
Consider these tips and tricks to elevate your gluten-free pie crust game:

1. Avoiding Over-Mixing: As mentioned earlier, over-mixing can result in a tough crust. Instead, mix the ingredients until they come together and avoid excessive dough handling.
2. Handling the Dough with Care: Gluten-free doughs are more delicate than their gluten-containing counterparts. Handle the dough gently to prevent it from falling apart.
3. Using the Right Pie Pan: Choose a sturdy pie pan that promotes even baking. Avoid glass pans, as they may cause the bottom crust to become soggy. Opt for metal or ceramic pans instead.
4. Enhancing the Flavor: Experiment with these ideas to enhance the flavor of your gluten-free pie crust:

• Sweet and Savory Variations: You can adjust the crust's flavor depending on your pie filling. For example, add sweetness for fruit pies or incorporate savory herbs for savory pies.
• Adding Spices and Herbs: Infuse your gluten-free pie crust with additional flavor by incorporating spices like cinnamon, nutmeg, or cardamom. Fresh herbs, such as thyme or rosemary, can also add a delightful twist.
• Experimenting with Nut Flours: Swap a portion of your gluten-free flour blend with nut flour like hazelnut or almond to add a subtle nuttiness to the crust. This variation works exceptionally well for pies with nut-based fillings.

Troubleshooting Common Issues
Address these common issues when baking a gluten-free pie crust:

1. Crumbly Crusts: If your crust tends to crumble, use enough binding agents like xanthan gum or flaxseed. Additionally, handle the dough gently to prevent it from falling apart.
2. Soggy Bottoms: To prevent a soggy bottom crust, ensure you pre-bake the crust before adding the filling. This step creates a barrier that prevents excess moisture from seeping into the crust.
3. Shrinking Crusts: If your crust shrinks during baking, allow it to rest in the refrigerator before rolling it out. Additionally, avoid stretching the dough too much when transferring it to the pie pan.

Conclusion
Creating a delicious gluten-free pie crust is within your reach. You can perfect your gluten-free pie crust recipe by understanding the challenges and employing the right techniques and ingredients. Then, enjoy indulging in a delicious pie without worrying about dietary restrictions or gluten sensitivities.

Introduction:
Pasta is a beloved dish in the United States and one of the key elements that make it so versatile and delicious is the sauce. There are numerous types of pasta sauce, each with its unique flavors and ingredients. In this article, we will explore some popular types of pasta sauce and provide step-by-step instructions on how to make them from scratch. Whether you're a beginner or an experienced home cook, you'll find something to suit your taste buds.

Marinara Sauce

• Marinara sauce is a classic Italian sauce made with tomatoes, garlic, onions, and herbs.
• Statistics: Did you know that Marinara sauce is one of the most popular pasta sauces in the United States, with over 77% of pasta dishes featuring it?
• Recipe:
  • Heat olive oil in a saucepan and sauté finely chopped onions and garlic until translucent.
  • Add crushed tomatoes, dried herbs (such as basil and oregano), salt, and pepper.
  • Simmer the sauce for about 30 minutes to allow the flavors to meld together.

Alfredo Sauce

• Alfredo sauce is a creamy and indulgent sauce that originated in Italy.
• Statistics: Alfredo sauce is most commonly paired with fettuccine, which is the third most popular pasta in the United States.
• Recipe:
  • Melt butter in a saucepan and add heavy cream, garlic, and grated Parmesan cheese.
  • Stir continuously until the cheese melts and the sauce thickens.
  • Season with salt and pepper according to taste.

Pesto Sauce

• Pesto sauce is a vibrant and fragrant sauce made from fresh basil, pine nuts, Parmesan cheese, garlic, and olive oil.
• Statistics: Pesto sauce is the second most popular pasta sauce in the United States, especially when paired with spaghetti.
• Recipe:
  • In a food processor, combine basil leaves, pine nuts, garlic, Parmesan cheese, and olive oil.
  • Blend until smooth and creamy.
  • Adjust the consistency by adding more olive oil if necessary or you may consider bulk condiment packets.

Bolognese Sauce

• Bolognese sauce is a rich and meaty sauce hailing from the Bologna region in Italy.
• Statistics: Bolognese sauce packets is commonly served with spaghetti, the most popular pasta shape in the United States.
• Recipe:
  • Sauté finely chopped onions, carrots, and celery in olive oil until soft.
  • Add ground beef and cook until browned.
  • Stir in crushed tomatoes, tomato paste, beef broth, and herbs.
  • Simmer the sauce for a few hours to develop the flavors.

Arrabbiata Sauce

• Arrabbiata sauce is a spicy tomato-based sauce that packs a punch.
• Statistics: Arrabbiata sauce is gaining popularity in the United States, with a 25% increase in consumption over the past five years.
• Recipe:
  • Sauté finely chopped onions and garlic in olive oil until golden.
  • Add crushed tomatoes, red pepper flakes, and dried herbs.
  • Simmer the sauce for 15-20 minutes to let the flavors meld together.

Vodka Sauce

• Vodka sauce is a creamy tomato-based sauce with a touch of vodka.
• Recipe:
  • Sauté finely chopped onions and garlic in olive oil until translucent.
  • Add crushed tomatoes, vodka, heavy cream, and dried herbs.
  • Simmer the sauce for 15-20 minutes, allowing the alcohol to cook off.
  • Season with salt and pepper.

Pomodoro Sauce

• Pomodoro sauce is a simple tomato sauce made with fresh tomatoes and minimal ingredients.
• Recipe:
  • Blanch fresh tomatoes in boiling water for a minute, then transfer them to an ice bath.
  • Peel off the skin and remove the seeds. Chop the tomatoes.
  • In a saucepan, heat olive oil and sauté minced garlic until fragrant.
  • Add the chopped tomatoes, salt, pepper, and a pinch of sugar.
  • Simmer the sauce for about 30 minutes until it thickens slightly.

Carbonara Sauce

• Carbonara sauce is a creamy and savory sauce made with eggs, Parmesan cheese, pancetta or bacon, and black pepper.
• Recipe:
  • Cook pancetta or bacon in a skillet until crispy. Set aside.
  • In a bowl, whisk together eggs, grated Parmesan cheese, black pepper, and a splash of pasta cooking water.
  • Cook pasta until al dente. Drain, reserving some cooking water.
  • In a pan, toss the pasta with the cooked pancetta or bacon, then add the egg mixture.
  • Stir quickly until the sauce thickens and coats the pasta. Add reserved pasta water if needed.

Béchamel Sauce

• Béchamel sauce is a creamy white sauce made from butter, flour, and milk, often used as a base for other sauces.
• Recipe:
  • Melt butter in a saucepan over medium heat. Stir in flour to create a roux.
  • Gradually whisk in milk until smooth and creamy.
  • Cook the sauce, stirring constantly, until it thickens.
  • Season with salt, pepper, and a pinch of nutmeg.

Amatriciana Sauce

• Amatriciana sauce is a tangy and spicy sauce made with pancetta or guanciale, tomatoes, onions, garlic, and red pepper flakes.
• Recipe:
  • In a skillet, cook pancetta or guanciale until crispy. Set aside.
  • Sauté finely chopped onions and minced garlic in olive oil until golden.
  • Add crushed tomatoes, red pepper flakes, and cooked pancetta or guanciale.
  • Simmer the sauce for about 20 minutes to let the flavors meld together.

Cacio e Pepe Sauce

• Cacio e Pepe sauce is a simple and flavorful sauce made with Pecorino Romano cheese, black pepper, and pasta cooking water.
• Recipe:
  • Cook pasta until al dente. Reserve some pasta cooking water.
  • In a pan, toast black pepper until fragrant.
  • Add cooked pasta and a ladle of pasta cooking water to the pan.
  • Sprinkle Pecorino Romano cheese over the pasta and toss until the cheese melts and creates a creamy sauce.

Truffle Cream Sauce

• Truffle cream sauce is a luxurious sauce infused with the earthy and distinctive flavor of truffles.
• Recipe:
  • In a saucepan, melt butter and sauté minced garlic until fragrant.
  • Add heavy cream and simmer until it thickens slightly.
  • Stir in truffle oil or finely grated truffles.
  • Season with salt and pepper to taste.

FAQs:

1. Can I use store-bought pasta sauce instead of making it from scratch?

• Absolutely! Store-bought pasta sauces are convenient and come in a variety of flavors. However, making sauce from scratch allows you to customize the taste and quality of ingredients.

1. How long can I store homemade pasta sauce?

• Homemade pasta sauce can be stored in the refrigerator for up to 4-5 days. You can also freeze it for longer storage, typically for up to 3 months.

This megathread is to house your questions regarding teambuilding or just questions in general about the game.
Don't hesitate to ask!

If asking for team advice SPECIFY WHICH CONTENT AND INCLUDE ALL YOUR UNITS

Frequently Asked Questions

There is no 2x Special Chance anymore
How To Raise Bounty/5 Gem Quests in CMM? A: If they aren’t event related, they are bounty quests; you finish them over time by completing events and you can’t rush them
Which TM units should I get from the shop? A: Visit /onepiecetc/w/guides/tmunitrankings
What do I do with dupes? A: See this comment by GoldFishPony, or follow the graphic in this post for legends.
How do I complete a Clash? A: There are clashes every day except Saturday in the Event tab. After Level 150 they can be unlocked from the Archive at any time.
What units should be farmed/purchased first? A: Recollection Archive, Kizuna Shop, Daily Raids, and PF Shop listed in this document.
How do I get more than +300 CC? A: Upgrading Pirate Festival facilities increases the CC cap.
Which 30 Gem ship(s) should I get? A: Hoe >>> Hind > Megalo = Oro Jackson = Castello > Zunesha = Shark> Germa > Koi. If you have both the Hind and Castello, you can probably hold off on Megalo.
What do I reroll fohow do I reroll? A: See the global guide here, created by Mr MattZz, Achilles, Gacha and FlyingDonut from the /OnePieceTC discord server.
What will I lose if I transfer devices? A: You will always lose mail. You will only lose gems and your gem subscription if transferring operating systems, such as going from iOS to Android or vice versa.
How many gems can I get from the Story/Colo? A: Check out this sheet for story and this one for colo.
Large download (600+ MB) every time you open the game? A: Free up more space on your phone, ideally 4+ gigabytes total.
Where can I find [Unit's 6+ Skull]? A: See this comment.
How do I trigger Invasions/How do I get skulls? A: Invasions have a chance to trigger (and have a chance to drop skulls) whenever you clear a raid that is 8* difficulty or higher and costs 60 stamina.

Helpful Resources

• Wiki
• Common Abbreviations and Nicknames
• Comprehensive Teambuilding Guide
• Beginner's Road Map
• Nakama Network Nakama Network is a website that has a variety of user-submitted teams for almost every piece of content in OPTC.
• OPTC-DB The OPTC Database has links to a variety of helpful resources (such as a complete character database, damage calculator and more!).

Current & Repeat Events

All concurrent events are updated manually and can be found in the following wiki pages:

• Events

Guides

Please refer to the sidebar, menu, wiki, megathreads OR use the search bar.

Question not answered? You may re-post within a reasonable time frame (~2H)

Do NOT ask for karma/upvotes. If you see anyone doing so, please report them.

Dlance thermal transfer resin a type of material used in thermal transfer printing processes is referred to as thermal transfer resin. DNB multiapps LLP thermal transfer printing uses heat to transfer ink from a ribbon onto a substrate, usually paper or synthetic materials. The base film, the ink layer, and the thermal transfer resin layer make up the ribbon's three layers. When heat is applied, the thermal transfer resin layer is in charge of carrying the ink and transferring it onto the substrate. For more details please visit our website: - https://dnb-ma.com/thermal-transfer-resin-black.php
​
Clear Print Black Wax Resin Make in India

Hi guys! I need your help deciding on my career
I (21F) recently graduated from CC with my general eds and transferring to a university this fall, which means I actually have to choose a major now lol.
Right now I’m enrolled in the Applied Technology program w an emphasis in design. I’m also completing an internship with an engineering design firm and it’s actually making me depressed. It’s nothing more than labeling information on the sheets and following established protocols by the state. Not to mention I’m stuck in a cubicle staring at my computer all day and I feel like I’m losing my sanity.
I literally cry after work everyday because my future looks bleak, and I can’t imagine doing this forever. I thought engineering would be cool and I could do more hands on stuff but I was wrong, it’s a bunch of CAD and paperwork. I don’t know what to do anymore. Being in a cubicle sucks too bc I hardly interact with any one all day. I always thought I would enjoy being alone, but it turns out that it gets pretty lonely and the day just drags on.
I know I’m privileged to even have an easy office job, but I feel that humans are not made for this type of work. It’s not even that I hate working, surprisingly my favorite job I’ve had was unloading the trucks at Walmart. I even looked forward to working bc I loved my coworkers & getting a workout.
So I thought about majoring in something health related, like a radiologist tech, pharm tech, a RN, or a dental assistant. Something that actually makes a difference. But I know they don’t make as much money as engineers. And I don’t even know if I’ll like it, so idk if it’ll be a mistake. I’m honestly so lost in life right now bc I realized that engineering is not for me. I genuinely just want to live a simple life, enough to support myself and my hobbies.
I’ve also considered becoming a tattoo artist, I love making art and I’ve done around quite a few tattoos so far. Art is my only passion, but I know that’s a tough lifestyle to pretty much be an independent artist, no retirement plan or 401K. But then again I feel that it would be a waste of my degree to do that.
Are any of you guys happy in your careers? If so pls share what you do, or what you think I would enjoy. My only goal in life tbh is to be happy. Any advice would be appreciated, thank you!

The purpose of this post is to discuss the historical period following World War One, as it has interesting things within it to learn about the concept of a "revolutionary period" and what that actually entails. You may have heard someone use that term before but without the proper historical context of what a revolutionary period even is it can be difficult to understand why someone might be saying that something is true or should happen "only in a revolutionary period" as an example. Specifically this thread of ideas I will be presenting will help to understand many of the foreign policy and geopolitical ideas many of us hold intuitively but might provide a theoretical basis to start to understand why it is that we might think or say certain things.
To add flavour I'm going to weave it together with an explanation of the term National Bolshevism as the term was originally coined during the "revolutionary period" of the post-WW1 era, rather than the way the term is used today to describe any group of people who may have labelled themselves "National Bolsheviks" since. The term is generally used today to describe people within the Soviet Union who attempted to adapt Communism to fit with Russian Nationalism, and that became a party itself in the 1993 post-Soviet crisis where Communists and Russians nationalists together resisted the kleptocratic "liberalization" as many careerist former party members took advantage of the collapse of the soviet union to seize control of the state assets they had technical control over.
However the term actually predates even the establishment of the Soviet Union in 1922, let alone any other 20th century regime (as it is sometimes erroneously used to describe people who support people who support both the Soviet Union and WW2 Germany, when this is merely circumstantial as the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact achieved what the original National Bolsheviks were trying to accomplish before either of those states truly existed) The term was originally used by a German Communist named Karl Radek to describe two other German Communist member he was expelling as "National Bolsheviks". What these people wanted to do was align the revolutionary movement in Germany with that in Russia in mutual opposition to both the treaty of Versailles and the treaty of Brest-Litovsk.
I am specifically defending the prospect of this strategy in particular rather than specifically any person who might have been or could have been advocating for it and any ideas they might have had otherwise, not because it is national, or even bolshevik, but rather because I think it conforms with the idea in the Communist Manifesto of the role of Communists in relation to Proletarians where the Communists do not form separate political programs of their own and instead are supposed to align various proletarians movements together across nationality with respect to the current stage than any of those movements may find themselves in.

In what relation do the Communists stand to the proletarians as a whole?
The Communists do not form a separate party opposed to the other working-class parties.
They have no interests separate and apart from those of the proletariat as a whole.
They do not set up any sectarian principles of their own, by which to shape and mould the proletarian movement.
The Communists are distinguished from the other working-class parties by this only: 1. In the national struggles of the proletarians of the different countries, they point out and bring to the front the common interests of the entire proletariat, independently of all nationality. 2. In the various stages of development which the struggle of the working class against the bourgeoisie has to pass through, they always and everywhere represent the interests of the movement as a whole.

Therefore the irony of this position I am defending is that it was the one advocated for by people labelled National, which would clearly seem to be contrary to being independent of nationality, and Bolshevik who would seem to be sectarians seeking to mold to proletarian movement. The other irony is that for it to have been possible it would have required overcoming proletarian movements in different nationalities operating independent of one another, in addition to overcoming the sectarianism emerging between all the differing "Communist" movements in this revolutionary period. In other words this is another call in an endless stream of "stop infighting!" coupled with "everyone except for me is wrong" which just contributes to the infighting by creating a new sectarian divergence but there is very little that can be done about that. Mostly this is just an excuse to discuss a particular moment I find interesting and inner contrarian in me just wants to make the seemingly most insane position seem the most reasonable as a challenge.
Lenin was not in favour of this so it was a bit of a non-starter. In "Left-Wing" Communism: An Infantile Disorder, he criticizes people who refuse to recognize the treaties, but in addition to the tendencies of so-called National Bolsheviks, he also criticized the Left-Communists that Karl Radek and the other German Revolutionaries were often members. Here we can start to see a problem emerging as you clearly have two different revolutionary movements in two different countries who are having difficulty working with each other (with the problem of the treaties between these countries not even being the main issue they were squabbling over). While not around long enough to have become officially a Left-Communist herself, Luxembourg is associated with them as her writings are cited as a major influence on the tendency, and she is notable for criticizing Lenin's Bolshevism.
In his criticisms of National Bolshevism it is revealed however that Lenin actually seems to agree with my overall position as Infantile Disorder was written in 1920 after which the relevant events were already over.

Lastly, one of the undoubted errors of the German “Lefts” lies in their downright refusal to recognise the Treaty of Versailles. The more “weightily” and “pompously”, the more “emphatically” and peremptorily this viewpoint is formulated (by K. Horner, for instance), the less sense it seems to make. It is not enough, under the present conditions of the international proletarian revolution, to repudiate the preposterous absurdities of “National Bolshevism” (Laufenberg and others), which has gone to the length of advocating a bloc with the German bourgeoisie for a war against the Entente. One must realise that it is utterly false tactics to refuse to admit that a Soviet Germany (if a German Soviet republic were soon to arise) would have to recognise the Treaty of Versailles for a time, and to submit to it. From this it does not follow that the Independents (My Explanation: Social Democrats or Democratic Socialists, I think Luxembourgists might be included in this term, basically the Independents split off from the regular Social Democrats in protest of the regular Social Democrats support of the war, and then they just kept splitting)—at a time when the Scheidemanns were in the government, when the Soviet government in Hungary had not yet been overthrown, and when it was still possible that a Soviet revolution in Vienna would support Soviet Hungary—were right, under the circumstances**, in putting forward the demand that the Treaty of Versailles should be signed**. At that time the Independents tacked and manoeuvred very clumsily, for they more or less accepted responsibility for the Scheidemann traitors, and more or less backslid from advocacy of a ruthless (and most calmly conducted) class war against the Scheidemanns, to advocacy of a “classless” or “above-class” standpoint.

So therefore Lenin was denouncing the people who still insisted on this position despite the revolutionary period in this particular location ending. In the revolutionary period the position the National Bolsheviks wanted was the correct one according to Lenin but they became wrong by continuing to insist upon it after the moment had past.
However notably Lenin only said the treaty having already been signed would only need to be recognized for a time. This implies that a socialist Germany of some kind could eventually overcome the treaty. While not a Soviet Germany, the probably infantile National Socialists were subjected to the same historical realities when they took over, and they too could not immediately begin rejecting the treaty and immediately going to war. For instance by immediately violating the treaty of Versailles army size limits by turning Rohm's SA into the regular German Army. Interestingly the decision to remove Rohm was likely pressured onto Hitler by Hindenburg and the official army (Reichswehr) with Hindenburg threatening to declare martial law and hand control of the country over the army if Hitler did not comply with demands to remove Rohm in the few months Hindenburg had remaining in his life as his health failed.

Both the Reichswehr and the conservative business community continued to complain to Hindenburg about the SA. In early June, defence minister Werner von Blomberg issued an ultimatum to Hitler from Hindenburg: unless Hitler took immediate steps to end the growing tension in Germany, Hindenburg would declare martial law and turn over control of the country to the army. The threat of a declaration of martial law from Hindenburg, the only person in Germany with the authority to potentially depose the Nazi regime, put Hitler under pressure to act.

This challenges the general idea that Hitler was immediately supremely powerful over everything, or that it was Hitler who did not want some apparently revolutionary army taking over in a second revolution. Rather the conservative aristocratic army in coordination with the pressure from international diplomats were able to enforce Hitler's compliance with them, with Hitler deciding to remain in control when given the ultimatum by Hindenburg. In my opinion the fact that Hitler dragged his feet for this long probably has more to do with Hitler realizing that have multiple sources of power was probably better than only having legal power. The article seems to indicate that Hitler "wanted" to do this earlier but held some kind of personal friendship with Rohm that made him reluctant to act against him, but that doesn't actually make sense. Hitler was power hungry yes, but it wouldn't make sense to not want to keep the SA in his back pocket as a challenging force to the military if he was power hungry like his was. It also however exposes the folly of the notion that one could force cooperation between classes in this manner with some supreme leader managing the class differences. Clearly not even Hitler could govern class unbiasedly, the conservative military was not going to allow their positions to be threatened by Hitler's dual-power-in-waiting.
Looping back to National Bolshevism, while the "National Bolsheviks" predated the National Socialists and didn't have anything to do with them, in principle the experience of National Socialism was the most likely outcome of any proposal for some kind of bourgeois alliance with the proletariats relegated to the junior position. The conservative military patriot support to the Red Army in Hungary was with the vanguard who in theory represented the proletariat in the senior position, however the Hungarians were capable of achieving this because it occurred during the revolutionary period where the proletariat was in a position to have the patriots join them instead of attempting to have some kind of revolution by joining the patriots. In short, revolution first, national liberation after. The path to national liberation must lay through revolution instead of seeking revolution through national liberation, because the reactionary classes will always be traitors with class interest upfront before national interest because it is the reactionary classes who have the most to lose in class terms.
Lenin himself seemingly called the November Criminals responsible for the treaty like Scheidemanns "traitors" so it is unfair to blame Bolshevism for the mistakes of the "independents" because they were not associated, and if what Lenin is saying about the situation is accurate it was precisely through calls for "classlessness" that the so-called "independents" abandoned the very class struggle which would have saved Germany from this fate. Therefore calls for classlessness to get out of a situation caused by classlessness were misguided, you cannot merely invert classlessness and get yourself in a different situation than you started in because the situations you found yourself in was never classless to begin with! It will always be the same classes making the decisions regardless of how you might invert your classless approach, and those classes will always be more interested in protecting their particular positions than whatever it is they claim to be focusing on.
There was a lot of confusion in this period and numerous tendencies diverging from one another, the reason being is that in the wake of the Russian Revolution and the end of the First World War there was a period of revolutionary activity across the entire world. While Russia and Germany are often the most focused upon due to the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany being our core 20th century players and many seeing these revolutions as the origin points of these things with a compare and contrast analysis being done to understand why one failed and the other succeeded. In the light of understanding the world revolution as a wave or period, looking at just these two revolutions becomes parochial, as there was clearly one singular revolution going on across the world in the same way as during the Revolutions of 1848 when the Communist Manifesto was published.
Indeed Marx and Engels viewed 1848 as a singular revolution and would have viewed the similar wave of revolutions that peaked in 1919 but spanned from 1917-1923 as a singular revolution. Arguably they would have also viewed all revolutions dating back to the beginning of history as one singular revolution but while they would say things like that they were also capable of distinguishing particular revolutions from each other and would recognize revolutions as being global affairs composed of mutually supporting local revolutions.
While differing in severity there was revolutionary activity in numerous countries ranging from the Two Red Years in Italy to the much less impressive sounding Red Week) in the Netherlands. Even as far away as Canada, Australia, and South Africa there were labour revolts in this period. The case of Canada is a bit emblematic of the obscurity of the scale of these events in popular history, as while the Winnipeg General Strike of 1919 is well known, much like with only Russia and Germany being discussed the strike wave nature of the events in Canada just as in the world tends to fall out of discussion, as for instance this wave actually started with a general strike in Vancouver that was crushed by the military.
In the Preface to the 1882 Russian Edition of the Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels even suggested in the wake of the assassination of the Tsar Liberator that the impending Russian (bourgeois) Revolution would serve as a signal for the Western proletariat to have their Revolution, and that the Russian Revolution could end up being communist alongside the West.

And now Russia! During the Revolution of 1848-9, not only the European princes, but the European bourgeois as well, found their only salvation from the proletariat just beginning to awaken in Russian intervention. The Tsar was proclaimed the chief of European reaction. Today, he is a prisoner of war of the revolution in Gatchina, and Russia forms the vanguard of revolutionary action in Europe.
The Communist Manifesto had, as its object, the proclamation of the inevitable impending dissolution of modern bourgeois property. But in Russia we find, face-to-face with the rapidly flowering capitalist swindle and bourgeois property, just beginning to develop, more than half the land owned in common by the peasants. Now the question is: can the Russian obshchina, though greatly undermined, yet a form of primeval common ownership of land, pass directly to the higher form of Communist common ownership? Or, on the contrary, must it first pass through the same process of dissolution such as constitutes the historical evolution of the West?
The only answer to that possible today is this: If the Russian Revolution becomes the signal for a proletarian revolution in the West, so that both complement each other, the present Russian common ownership of land may serve as the starting point for a communist development.

Now 1882 didn't turn into a revolution in Russia and there were several false starts like in 1905, but eventually it did finally happen. However seemingly with Lenin's New Economic Policy, both scenarios discussed ended up needing to happen. The Russian Revolution was both Communist and they felt it impossible to transition straight into Communism and thus had to allow some kind of bourgeois property relation to develop, and then later on had to eliminate this thing they created themselves in a rather unfortunate series of events. Additionally while the Russian Revolution did prove to be a signal for the Western proletariat to have their revolution, the proletariat revolution in this period failed.
In the spirit of this discussion I'm going to be argue that these were not separate incidents but rather the failure of the western proletariat's revolution is why Lenin implemented the NEP in 1922, in part because of internal rebellions calling for these things, and because the international revolution seemingly failed resulting in a loss of hope that the western proletariat would in some way save them, which had to result in some kind of proletarian vanguard party lead bourgeois state emerging on the fly. Stalin would later have to undo both these consequences in the events he is criticized most for, as in addition to reversing the NEP with collectivization, he also undid the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk when as Molotov said "One kick from the German army and another from the Soviet Army put an end to this ugly product of Versailles" in regards to Poland.
Polish independence being quite the unfortunate sacrifice here considering how supportive of it Engels was in the 1892 Polish Preface the the Communist Manifesto.

But the rapid development of Polish industry, outstripping that of Russia, is in its turn a new proof of the inexhaustible vitality of the Polish people and a new guarantee of its impending national restoration. And the restoration of an independent and strong Poland is a matter which concerns not only the Poles but all of us. A sincere international collaboration of the European nations is possible only if each of these nations is fully autonomous in its own house. The Revolution of 1848, which under the banner of the proletariat, after all, merely let the proletarian fighters do the work of the bourgeoisie, also secured the independence of Italy, Germany and Hungary through its testamentary executors, Louis Bonaparte and Bismarck; but Poland, which since 1792 had done more for the Revolution than all these three together, was left to its own resources when it succumbed in 1863 to a tenfold greater Russian force. The nobility could neither maintain nor regain Polish independence; today, to the bourgeoisie, this independence is, to say the last, immaterial. Nevertheless, it is a necessity for the harmonious collaboration of the European nations. It can be gained only by the young Polish proletariat, and in its hands it is secure. For the workers of all the rest of Europe need the independence of Poland just as much as the Polish workers themselves.

(The call for "full autonomy in a nation's own house" is probably worth explaining. Nations that should be autonomous are nations which can be autonomous all on their own without international meddling. Engels was notoriously against all the south slavs for their pan-slavism because their independence was necessitated by interference from Imperial Russia, in part because he was still mad about the revolutions of 1848 not working out where Russian intervened to supposedly rescue the south Slavs. He was even still mad at them 34 years later when he reaffirmed Polish independence alongside Irish independence as the most crucial national struggles to support. The reason being that Poland rejected pan-Slavism and was instead independently nationalist.
That Poland could stand alone (and more importantly that Polish agitation threatened three reactionary imperial monarchies in Germany, Austria, and Russia at the same time. Ireland being important to screw around with the bourgeois British Empire as Marx and Engels increasingly saw the absentee revenues the British ruling class generated for themselves in Ireland as being the key to their parliamentary political dominance in England against both lower class and anti-imperialist challenges which were often the same thing) is why Polish independence was so supported. Standing alone is important because autonomous nations can switch between the rule of various classes without the risk of foreign interference on the part of imperialist reactionaries putting things back the way they were to protect their sphere of influence. The issue is that Polish independence ended up being a thorn in the side of the revolution when Polish independence was granted through Wilsonian liberal internationalism and during the Russian Civil War the Red Army tried and failed to retaliate against Poland when they joined forces with the Entente Liberal Imperialists that were intervening in the civil war in what is called the Soviet-Poland War.
For you NATO fans the opposition to NATO comes from this concept of being against spheres of influence, with a preference for complete independence. The Soviets or even Russia joining NATO however transform the institution from an American sphere of influence into just some vague "nobody invade anybody else okay guys thanks bye" treaty which is what it is sold as. So long as Russia is not included in NATO it fails to fulfill its stated purpose of ensuring peace in europe, and it must be opposed because it does not protect the independence of the nations within it, rather it makes them subservient to the United States. The counter-balance of Russia inside the block is sufficient that the nations within it could seamlessly transfer between spheres of influence, or more importantly, not be in anyone's sphere of influence at all by successfully playing the US and Russia off each other, which puts each nation in a position to pursue development with little risk of the alliance being used to punish them.
If say Luxembourg decided to go rogue it could even use the NATO treaty to argue that anyone infringing upon them should be subjected to retaliation by all the other members, and now you can have a socialist Luxembourg in the middle of Europe and they can't do anything about it because the treaty guarantees their independence with multiple dozen moving parts who might not agree on punishing this Luxembourg so long as Luxembourg doesn't militarily invade anybody. However if the organization is nothing more that an American political block with US bases every where, clearly the US would be able to pressure countries into recognizing the socialist Luxembourg as illegitimate in some way and argue it can be invaded without requiring everyone come to its defense. So NATO is good if Russia is included and US bases removed, and an in NATO Russia still isn't a threat to even Estonia if dozens of European countries are required to defend it, and that isn't even considering a late arrival of the US and Canada when they finally cross the Atlantic. The problem with NATO is that it is clearly an unofficial loosely held US empire, it stops being a problem when it is no longer this)
This whole confused mess could have been avoided had the world revolution not failed. This circles back to the Russian and German revolutions and how they were not united. Therefore the position of those labelled Nazbol is attractive merely for the sake that it would have united these two disparate revolutions. The success of either was reliant on the success of the other. The prior Bolshevik position of Peace Without Annexations or Indemnities would permanently lock in the Russian and German revolutions together in a mutual opposition to the bourgeois treaties, a pact of blood to oppose the pacts signed in ink.
Additionally opposition to the indemnity aspect of the treaty of Versailles would have been in fidelity to the revolutionary history of the Paris Commune which inspired the notion of the dictatorship of the proletariat in 1871, which was prompted in part by opposition to the burden of the reparation payments imposed on France by Bismark in response to Napolean III's failed invasion being placed on the people of France by the bourgeois government that signed that treaty. On a global scale while the opportunity for revolution by the proletariat refusing to enter World War One was squandered by the Social Democrats granting their permission, the proletariat could instead refuse to exit World War One by not granting their permission for acceptance of the bourgeois treaties just as the Paris Commune refused to accept Bismark's treaty.
Indeed opposition to the bourgeois Treaty of Trianon served as the basis for cooperation between the Nationalists and the Communists in Hungary, who unlike the Luxembourgists in Germany, were internationally aligned with the Bolsheviks in Russia with the establishment of the Hungarian Soviet Republic. The alliance however broke down with the establishment of the Slovak Soviet Republic as the Hungarian nationalists questioned why they were participating in the Hungarian Red Army if they were just going to be liberating other countries, this ended up not even being that relevant of a dispute seeing as Slovakia was never fully captured and the Czechoslovak army ended up recapturing it in a month and so the issue only lasted from June 1919 to July 1919. However it exposed the core obvious problem with the alliance between nationalists and communists, as the full Petrograd formula was "peace without annexations or indemnities, on the basis of self-determination of the peoples" so the nationalists opposed to treaties were not going to like it when the second part got implemented later.
Lenin and Stalin ran into a similar issues when Stalin opposed Georgian self-determination in 1922 and wanted them to instead join Russia, with the comical situation of Stalin calling the Georgian Mensheviks "nationalist-socialists" and the Russian Lenin accusing the Georgian Stalin of being a Russian nationalist-socialist in response. We can clearly see that there are vastly differing views on the questions of nationality all over the place and there was no one line being taken, with Hungary and Germany taking vastly different views in regards to the treaties and cooperation with nationalists, to their own unique sets of problems later on with them.
The vastly different ways everyone was handling these issues is why I argue that the best principle would have been to have no principles at all. The only communist principle in regards to nationality is international cooperation. While you had Communist revolutions in German, Hungary, and Russia, the common thread linking them together could have been opposition to the bourgeois treaties, which also would have also united them with the liberal Kemalist revolution in Turkey, thus completing the alignment of all revolutionaries in the central powers and Imperial Russia against the rest of the entente attempting to impose the bourgeois treaties, in effect adding Russia to the central powers after the imperialist war had turned into a civil war in all four imperial monarchies. That Turkey was in a vastly different stage of revolution than the other three would be irrelevant as these revolutions would still be mutually supporting of each other, and the Communists could rest assured safely knowing that while differing countries might be in different stages of revolution, they had the advantage over all others in knowing the ultimate end result of all their revolutions even if the people operating in them might not know it themselves.

The Communists, therefore, are on the one hand, practically, the most advanced and resolute section of the working-class parties of every country, that section which pushes forward all others; on the other hand, theoretically, they have over the great mass of the proletariat the advantage of clearly understanding the line of march, the conditions, and the ultimate general results of the proletarian movement.

As such the notion that one needs to be politically Communist to participate in the revolution is false. So long as a state of revolution remained, the stages of the revolution could continue moving forward. If Turkey was not materially ready for it, that need not matter so long as the Kemalists were willing to join in an anti-imperialist block in the mean time, which they were willing to do until the Soviets later started looking at the straights with desire which eventually pushed Turkey into the arms of NATO where it remains to this day. However at the time the Soviets and Turkey were quite friendly despite their obvious ideological differences merely based on this mutual geopolitical interest in so-called anti-imperialism. This anti-imperialism was selective however, with the "Mountain Turks" and "Mountain Russians" being sacrificed for it, but the benefits of not having principles means you don't exactly have to care about that. Ataturk can make poutine out of the Kurds all he wants if he remains staunchly anti-imperialist on an international level.
This gross cynical realism while obviously questionable is still consistent with Revolutionary History as all prior revolutions do not stand up to moral scrutiny when they are viewed in this way. In fact at the twilight of the 1848 revolutions Engels himself called for the Hungarians to wipeout the "counter-revolutionary" Slavs, while this is obviously not something we should want to have happened, and we definitely should not ever do this if we ever find ourselves in a position to make those decisions, it is important to understand the reasoning behind why he was saying those things, that it is the continuance of the revolution itself is both the most important thing, and something that is largely out of anyone's control in the Hegelian sense of Historicism.

The Magyar cause is not in such a bad way as mercenary black-and-yellow [colours of the Austrian flag] enthusiasm would have us believe. The Magyars are not yet defeated. But if they fall, they will fall gloriously, as the last heroes of the 1848 revolution, and only for a short time. Then for a time the Slav counter-revolution will sweep down on the Austrian monarchy with all its barbarity, and the camarilla will see what sort of allies it has. But at the first victorious uprising of the French proletariat, which Louis Napoleon is striving with all his might to conjure up, the Austrian Germans and Magyars will be set free and wreak a bloody revenge on the Slav barbarians. The general war which will then break out will smash this Slav Sonderbund and wipe out all these petty hidebound nations, down to their very names.
The next world war will result in the disappearance from the face of the earth not only of reactionary classes and dynasties, but also of entire reactionary peoples. And that, too, is a step forward.

A key fact you will observe is that they are often quite over eager in announcing the impending revolution. For instance The Magyar Struggle was published in January of 1849 in Marx's Newspaper, and Louis Napoleon was elected President of France in December of 1848. It seems as if they might have thought that this would have been more significant than it actually turned out to be. This kind of made sense though because Louis Napoleon's main opponent in the election was Louis-Eugene Cavagnac who lead the army to suppress a worker's uprising in Paris back in the "June Days" of 1848. Additionally the Hungarians did not do what Engels said they would, instead they adopted cultural assimilation policies called Magyarization, and late in the revolution into 1849 while the Russian and Austria Imperial armies were barring down on them they adopted minority right protections to try to win them back. However they were ultimately unsuccessful in repelling the Russian invasion regardless of any attempts at outreach.
What I find notable about this is that Engels essentially predicted the sides of the "next world war" (albeit there was a world war in between) that would wipeout entire peoples, but somehow ended up reversing the reactionary and revolutionary sides, as an Austrian German and the Hungarians did engage in a war against the Slavs, but because somehow the "poles of revolution" did somehow invert and head outwards from Russia like Engels said the Slavs supposedly wanted, that war was against the revolution instead of for it.

There is no country in Europe which does not have in some corner or other one or several ruined fragments of peoples, the remnant of a former population that was suppressed and held in bondage by the nation which later became the main vehicle of historical development. These relics of a nation mercilessly trampled under foot in the course of history, as Hegel says, these residual fragments of peoples always become fanatical standard-bearers of counter-revolution and remain so until their complete extirpation or loss of their national character, just as their whole existence in general is itself a protest against a great historical revolution.
Such, in Scotland, are the Gaels, the supporters of the Stuarts from 1640 to 1745.
Such, in France, are the Bretons, the supporters of the Bourbons from 1792 to 1800.
Such, in Spain, are the Basques, the supporters of Don Carlos.
Such, in Austria, are the pan-Slavist Southern Slavs, who are nothing but the residual fragment of peoples, resulting from an extremely confused thousand years of development. That this residual fragment, which is likewise extremely confused, sees its salvation only in a reversal of the whole European movement, which in its view ought to go not from west to east, but from east to west, and that for it the instrument of liberation and the bond of unity is the Russian knout — that is the most natural thing in the world.

However a lot can apparently change in almost 100 years. Russia was once seen as the bastion of reaction celebrated by the reactionaries everywhere for having invaded Hungary to put down the 1848-9 revolution, but then became the center of revolution, taking that spot from France which didn't really participate in the Revolutions despite the 1917 mutinies defused in June by Philip Petain by reassuring the soldiers by calling off the offensives that were intended to try to reassure the Provision Russian Government from the February Revolution to stay in the war and who launched the "Kerensky Offensive" in July which prompted the unsuccessful "July Days" Bolshevik uprising before the later successful October Revolution.
The absence of French participation beyond this is remarkable given how much they played a role in other revolutions and also remarkable how it was later Vichy leader Petain himself who basically defused the situation by giving the soldiers what they wanted and ending the suicidal offensives. The difference between Petain and Kerensky here and that the Russian revolution had not yet gone proletariat at this point while France was dealing with its own situation coming up from the soldiers and that the Russian version of this happened only a month afterwards should probably be focused on more here, in addition to how the differing approaches countries took on simultaneous and similar events from 1917-1923 should be analyzed like how I am suggesting
Since the Russian Revolution the apparent "pole of reaction" where global reactionaries collect as their refuge that Russia represented seemingly shifted to the United States for the Cold War after the pole reversal and global political magnetic field collapse manifesting in the out of place auroral borealis of the inter-war period and world war 2. It would be reasonable to assume that it would be just as possible for the United States to become a new center of revolution in the way Russia took that position from France despite Russia being the most reactionary power of anyone before that happened.

Hi Guys, hope you can help me with the following questions?
I have recently set up as a sole trader and is paid from my clients on an incentive or project based basis, because of this I haven't been putting working hours onto my invoice. However, I would like to be able to do so for tracking and future Visa application purposes (I know, I should have been doing this earlier) and I'm just wondering how should I go about it. Should I just use and excel sheet (not sure if this official enough) or is there any software that I can do this in an official way?
Another question that I would like to ask is that I have already set up a separate bank account for business income, would it be fine for me to transfer all the money to a separate saving account straight away or should I leave a portion of it.
Thanks in advance for any helps.
Edit: I forgot to clarify that the main reason for the hours log is for Visa application purposes

Ok, so Im doing a huge order and ordered 40 sheets. It's the goof proof which says 80 psi for 4-6 seconds at 365. I used my clamping heat press and it would not work no matter what temp/pressure I used. So I bought a heat press that you press yourself and still the transfers weren't even leaving the paper. Does anyone know anything that may be wrong?

I just transferred and they haven’t gotten my schedule sheet due to me not being in the system at the time. They just put out the schedule for the next two weeks and they have the wrong time and dates. Can I come early and tell them if I could changed my schedule for the next two weeks? I do 6-3 but im on for 9-6.

Previous post:
I (46 F) am afraid I don’t have enough time with my father (80 M) and don’t know what to do
My mother is a narc. I realized that in 2008 when I got married and she tried to ruin the wedding for me and my husband ( in addition to other previous incidents that I naively didn’t comprehend ) for months after that I tried to understand what was the reason for her behavior and did some research online and finally understood why. As with narc ppl she tried to turn everybody including family members and relatives from both sides ( her family , my father family even tried to brainwash my mother in law ) against me. My father is clearly a puppet in her hands. Not to bore you with the details I went NC with her and LC with dad for a few years. In 2018 I was diagnosed with congenital heart disease , my dad with prostate cancer and my husband with hypertension within weeks. My relationship with my dad became a bit better especially that mom left him to go overseas and stay with my brother who was on a scholarship. I spoke to my sisters again. I had an open heart surgery in 2019. My father had therapy and became stable and is following up routinely. After a while my narc mom tried to pull strings again. My relationship with everybody became strained and honestly I was afraid my life will be ruined by my mom interfering so I went to very LC again. I was ok with this very LC situation for a while ( especially that I have been having other health problems : removed a benign tumor few months ago ) but then I learned that my father have cardiac problems a couple of months ago. He is taking some kind of infusion every 3 months. I used to take care of his follow up with doctors and appointments for prostate Ca in the hospital I used to work in until things became strained because of mom and I resigned anyway. My father is almost 80yrs old. I’m thinking that may be not a lot of time is left, but every time I try to come close my mom pops in and try to manipulate things and twist them to her advantage. Sometimes I think the best thing is to stay LC. Sometimes I feel worried, sad and anxious about my father. I really don’t know what to do now. I’m under a lot of stress. I feel like I’m gonna collapse soon. I don’t think there is a solution as long as my mom is in the pic. Any advice or love is very much appreciated. Note : ESL , also I feel so depressed so my thoughts are all over the place, sorry .
Updated yesterday:
My father became very sick in Ramadan and couldn’t fast for about a week ( he never stopped fasting no matter what he is going thru ) I spoke to him on the phone and he was coughing severely and barely breathing!! I was so alarmed !! I have 5 adult siblings that live at home with him / 4 married and living outside the house and they seem to not exerting any effort to take care of him. He went to E/R twice and still not a lot of improvement. I was barely sleeping thinking about him, praying that he becomes better and practicing other spiritual activities for him. I know I sound silly but I couldn’t do anything more because of my narc mom. I was checking on him every day multiple times. He became better ( surprisingly ) and his cough subsided and almost breathed normally again. May be it’s the emotional support and love that made him better. Any way fast forward to Eid, he collapsed again. This time I told him I WILL attend with him his appointments with the hematology clinic. I can’t describe to you the moment we saw each other at the hospital ! Imagine an 80 year old man crying like a baby !! He lost it in front of people!! He said I feel better already that I met you my daughter!! I cried a bit and then we both got a hold on ourselves and went to the appointment. The physician was a very sweet lady that was considerate and helpful. My father proudly told het that I am a nuclear medicine technical specialist. I told her that dad was having this cough that wont go, she told me she will speak to her colleague- a thoracic consultant- and we can see him immediately!! Long story short I spent 4-5 hours with him performing all the tests and was diagnosed with lung infection. He was put on antibiotics and cough syrup and inhalers. He became better. Since then I am attending with him all his appointments ( it had been around two months) I am taking care of him as much as possible ( remotely) after we finish each appointment, we go to sit together in a coffee inside the hospital. He confessed to me that my mother is treating him poorly and have turned all my siblings against him also and they also are uneasy with him. An 80 yr old man, sick , fragile , hearing impaired and walks with a cane drives himself to his appointments and attends his appointments alone. I forgave my father for previously siding with my mother - after all she is a narc and very manipulative and is a master in brainwashing - she is so evil, she used him, convinced him to write her half of the around 3 million dollars house and most probably took advantage of his illness to transfer the rest of his money to her bank account. She is trying to get rid of him !! He literally told me she want him dead ! My father is sane and will never make up stories like this about her. I forgot to mention that after few meetings he asked me if I want to go back to work and told him that I am still not stable health wise so he insisted on me to give him my bank account and wired me around 26k dollars. I think that is what is left in his bank account. He have a retirement stipend every month. So he is basically living on that stipend alone ( and provides for the people living with him at home aka mom and siblings ) I’m scared now that she might cause his health to deteriorate ( switching pills or something ) he told me that once he told the house help to not put salt in lunch because of his cardiac condition and he heard mother later telling her to put MORE salt !! She is trying to make him sick and trying to drive him crazy !! No wonder he is so depressed. I thought of inviting him to live with me but I know that my evil narc mom will use it to her advantage and may create a seen in front of the neighbors and apparently everyone as she has done it before with her sister in law in front of her VIP guests ( reputation is everything where we live ) and of course we don’t want this drama. In terms of meeting my dad and attending his appointments with him to help and take care of him, it’s exhausting but rewarding relationship wise. We are both happy that things are much better between us. But I am worried about him. I wake up sometimes at night thinking of different scenarios of what will happen in the near future to him. Today he told me he became sick suddenly during driving and that he had to stop driving and park for a while until he is a bit better before resuming driving home. It’s terrifying. I don’t know what to do. I don’t think there is anything that can be dine tbh. Any advice or love is very much appreciated. Thank you for reading.
TLDR: my narc mom turned everyone against me including my dad for several years and recently she turned everyone against my 80 yrs old dad after he became sick and fragile. Other important details in the post.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kov5nVACR2CEzcpsEynWthlmCMWCwlmPVL4gUa2lB1A/edit?usp=sharing
With the following link you will want to click the second tab for all data and achievements for each player after the first year with Updated CA, Transfer Value, Club, Loan/Transferred, Appearances, Goals, Assists, Avg Rating, Injury over 4 Weeks, Club Finishes, International Stats, Trophies/Awards, and Milestones!
The third Tab has a TOP 5 List for Increase in Current Ability, Highest Transfer Value, Highest Average rating (10+ games), Highest Goals, and Highest Assists!
I will individually send everyone the link and reddit invite incase anyone is still in the regular FM reddit.
If you have any questions or requests about the sheet or you specific player feel free to let me know and Ill do my best to help out. This project has taken over 16 hours already so any kind words or donations are more than welcome but of course not required!
If anyone would like a screenshot of their players current stats just let me know. (EDIT-By Popular demand I will screenshot of stats in next update)

My mother is a narc. I realized that in 2008 when I got married and she tried to ruin the wedding for me and my husband ( in addition to other previous incidents that I naively didn’t comprehend ) for months after that I tried to understand what was the reason for her behavior and did some research online and finally understood why. As with narc ppl she tried to turn everybody including family members and relatives from both sides ( her family , my father family even tried to brainwash my mother in law ) against me. My father is clearly a puppet in her hands. Not to bore you with the details I went NC with her and LC with dad for a few years. In 2018 I was diagnosed with congenital heart disease , my dad with prostate cancer and my husband with hypertension within weeks. My relationship with my dad became a bit better especially that mom left him to go overseas and stay with my brother who was on a scholarship. I spoke to my sisters again. I had an open heart surgery in 2019. My father had therapy and became stable and is following up routinely. After a while my narc mom tried to pull strings again. My relationship with everybody became strained and honestly I was afraid my life will be ruined by my mom interfering so I went to very LC again. I was ok with this very LC situation for a while ( especially that I have been having other health problems : removed a benign tumor few months ago ) but then I learned that my father have cardiac problems a couple of months ago. He is taking some kind of infusion every 3 months. I used to take care of his follow up with doctors and appointments for prostate Ca in the hospital I used to work in until things became strained because of mom and I resigned anyway. My father is almost 80yrs old. I’m thinking that may be not a lot of time is left, but every time I try to come close my mom pops in and try to manipulate things and twist them to her advantage. Sometimes I think the best thing is to stay LC. Sometimes I feel worried, sad and anxious about my father. I really don’t know what to do now. I’m under a lot of stress. I feel like I’m gonna collapse soon. I don’t think there is a solution as long as my mom is in the pic. Any advice or love is very much appreciated.
Note : ESL , also I feel so depressed so my thoughts are all over the place, sorry .
Note : this is a post I put few weeks ago and removed because I am paranoid that someone will inform my narc mom. I posted it again because there is an update to be linked shortly.
Update : I (46 F) am afraid I don’t have enough time with my father (80 M) and don’t know what to do
My father became very sick in Ramadan and couldn’t fast for about a week ( he never stopped fasting no matter what he is going thru ) I spoke to him on the phone and he was coughing severely and barely breathing!! I was so alarmed !! I have 5 adult siblings that live at home with him / 4 married and living outside the house and they seem to not exerting any effort to take care of him. He went to E/R twice and still not a lot of improvement. I was barely sleeping thinking about him, praying that he becomes better and practicing other spiritual activities for him. I know I sound silly but I couldn’t do anything more because of my narc mom. I was checking on him every day multiple times. He became better ( surprisingly ) and his cough subsided and almost breathed normally again. May be it’s the emotional support and love that made him better. Any way fast forward to Eid, he collapsed again. This time I told him I WILL attend with him his appointments with the hematology clinic. I can’t describe to you the moment we saw each other at the hospital ! Imagine an 80 year old man crying like a baby !! He lost it in front of people!! He said I feel better already that I met you my daughter!! I cried a bit and then we both got a hold on ourselves and went to the appointment. The physician was a very sweet lady that was considerate and helpful. My father proudly told het that I am a nuclear medicine technical specialist. I told her that dad was having this cough that wont go, she told me she will speak to her colleague- a thoracic consultant- and we can see him immediately!! Long story short I spent 4-5 hours with him performing all the tests and was diagnosed with lung infection. He was put on antibiotics and cough syrup and inhalers. He became better. Since then I am attending with him all his appointments ( it had been around two months) I am taking care of him as much as possible ( remotely) after we finish each appointment, we go to sit together in a coffee inside the hospital. He confessed to me that my mother is treating him poorly and have turned all my siblings against him also and they also are uneasy with him. An 80 yr old man, sick , fragile , hearing impaired and walks with a cane drives himself to his appointments and attends his appointments alone. I forgave my father for previously siding with my mother - after all she is a narc and very manipulative and is a master in brainwashing - she is so evil, she used him, convinced him to write her half of the around 3 million dollars house and most probably took advantage of his illness to transfer the rest of his money to her bank account. She is trying to get rid of him !! He literally told me she want him dead ! My father is sane and will never make up stories like this about her. I forgot to mention that after few meetings he asked me if I want to go back to work and told him that I am still not stable health wise so he insisted on me to give him my bank account and wired me around 26k dollars. I think that is what is left in his bank account. He have a retirement stipend every month. So he is basically living on that stipend alone ( and provides for the people living with him at home aka mom and siblings ) I’m scared now that she might cause his health to deteriorate ( switching pills or something ) he told me that once he told the house help to not put salt in lunch because of his cardiac condition and he heard mother later telling her to put MORE salt !! She is trying to make him sick and trying to drive him crazy !! No wonder he is so depressed. I thought of inviting him to live with me but I know that my evil narc mom will use it to her advantage and may create a seen in front of the neighbors and apparently everyone as she has done it before with her sister in law in front of her VIP guests ( reputation is everything where we live ) and of course we don’t want this drama. In terms of meeting my dad and attending his appointments with him to help and take care of him, it’s exhausting but rewarding relationship wise. We are both happy that things are much better between us. But I am worried about him. I wake up sometimes at night thinking of different scenarios of what will happen in the near future to him. Today he told me he became sick suddenly during driving and that he had to stop driving and park for a while until he is a bit better before resuming driving home. It’s terrifying. I don’t know what to do. I don’t think there is anything that can be dine tbh. Any advice or love is very much appreciated. Thank you for reading.
TLDR: my narc mom turned everyone against me including my dad for several years and recently she turned everyone against my dad after he became sick and old. Other important details in the post.

Help with ink transfer
I made a Coptic bound book as a gift for someone. The first 10 pages or so I used a typewriter to add some text. The rest of the pages (another 30-40) I left blank with the intention of adding more text later.
I’ve tried looking into heat transfer or some other transfer method to print using a standard printer and then transfer into the book but I can’t find much beyond t-shirt ink transfer info. Anyone have experience with this?
Anyone have any suggestions on how to transfer ink/text without taking the book apart? I’m hoping to avoid having to re-bind it by hand.
Thank you!

Good day!
I am about to embark on building my cab-over camper this summer and am trying to find some siding and roof material options. I am on a masters student budget so affordability is paramount.
I am making the frame out of aluminum as I have the equipment to rivet and weld. I plan on using 1" thick R-3.85 foam insulation. Here's the dilemma: I want to use .025" thick aluminum sheet as it has excellent heat transfer rates and is fairly reflective (in terms of energy) when painted. Unfortunately, it is super expensive and out of my budget unless I'm missing something.
Because of this I'm thinking of going with some sort of painted wood? Possibly RV siding?
Any insight on this topic would be well appreciated!! TIA

PURPOSE

• What's the purpose of your next card
  
  • Free Balance Transfer with at least 12 month 0% interest
• Do you have any cards you've been looking at?
  
  • I’ll take anything. I just got denied from First Tech Federal Union Choice Rewards World Mastercard
• Why?
  
  • I have $9,000 balance on Discover It and the 0% APY is ending in July. I would like to find new card I can balance transfer for free and have an extra 12 or more months to pay off my debt. All my other cards are paid off on time every month.

CREDIT PROFILE

• Current credit cards you are the primary account holder of
  
  • (Personal) Apple Card, $10,000 limit, opened 08/2019
  • (Personal) Citi Aadvantage MileUp, $5,800 limit, opened 09/2021
  • (Personal) Discover It, $10,000 limit, opened 04/2022
  • (Business) Chase Business Cash Ink, $7,000 limit, opened 09/2022
• FICO Scores with source
  
  • 677 (Discover FICO Credit Scorecard)
• Oldest credit card account age with you as primary name on the account:
  
  • 6 years, 10 months
• Number of personal credit cards approved for in the past 6 months:
  
  • 0
• Number of personal credit cards approved for in the past 12 months:
  
  • 0
• Number of personal credit cards approved for in the past 24 months:
  
  • 1
• Annual income $:
  
  • $40,000

throwaway account for obvious reasons

So i impulse bought a FW reaver and warlord titan (the full size ones, not adeptus titanicus) a week ago, and I’ve spent the last few days looking for transfers/decals to no avail.
Any ideas of from where to procure said decals?
The official ones seem long out of print. I’ve found low quality images of the FW transfer sheets but I don’t think they will be good enough to make half decent decals from.
Was hoping for Legio Gryphonicus, but at this stage I’ll take anything that is remotely appropriate for a titan, whether official or otherwise.
Tldr - what are you all doing for transfers/decals on your titans?

I have been using Daiso paper I purchased on Amazon to render ink paintings with great success. However, I've ordered many other papers to find one larger than 9x13 inches. So far, no luck. I purchased a variety of semi-sized and raw xuan papers from Blue Heron arts and others. The xuan papers are absorbent and difficult to work with. Does anyone know a good replacement for the Daiso paper? I've looked on Inkston, but I am not sure which is best to order, and they are sold out of their sample pack of papers. These papers are not cheap, and I don't want to spend another $75 on 10 sheets of paper I may not use. Thanks for any help!

It’s printing which big globs of ink all over the sheet. I replaced the maintamce filter and have done the cleaning cycle but it just keeps printing like the pictures shown on all the test prints. Looks like there’s a leak? Any opinions/advice very much appreciated :)

So I'm working on a project creating a species for a site called 4dopt. 4dopt is like a Adoptable make your own and trade character game. Sort of like toyhouse, but more like a interactive adventure.
Anyways, I'm trying to decide on a species name and this us the base look. I plan in adding various kinds of the same character, but different poses and attributes. Oh and thus isn't inked yet, just a sketch idea.
So not only so I want to world build around this little fella but would really appreciate any kind of feedback or ideas. Where do you think this would live? What would it be like temperament wise? I want t really make a reference sheet at some point too, so I've got plans with thus fella!